{"id":2910,"date":"2021-05-05T03:42:41","date_gmt":"2021-05-05T03:42:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/course.oeru.org\/ccom103\/?page_id=2910"},"modified":"2021-05-05T03:42:41","modified_gmt":"2021-05-05T03:42:41","slug":"ccom-103-marking-rubric","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/course.oeru.org\/ccom103\/learning-pathways\/assessment\/ccom-103-marking-rubric\/","title":{"rendered":"CCOM 103 Marking Rubric"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Marking Rubric<\/span><\/h2>\n

Use the rubric below to give yourself an idea of how well you have completed the assessment.\n<\/p>\n

This is the same rubric that will be used to mark your assessment if you choose to be formally assessed.\n<\/p>\n

Conflict communications (100%)<\/span><\/h3>\n

\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Criteria\n<\/th>\nC\n<\/th>\nB\n<\/th>\nA\n<\/th>\nWeighting\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Conflict context<\/b>\n<\/td>\nThe chosen conflict situation is badly explained.\n<\/td>\nThe chosen conflict situation is explained but little detail provided.\n<\/td>\nThe chosen conflict situation is explained clearly and with sufficient detail.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Use of techniques from the course<\/b>\n<\/td>\nThe email makes use of none of the communication techniques taught in the course.\n<\/td>\nThe email makes use of the communication techniques taught in the course but in an incomplete manner.\n<\/td>\nThe email makes explicit use of the communication techniques taught in the course, and does so throughout.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clear explanation of the situation and what comes next<\/b>\n<\/td>\nThe email poorly explains the situation, the bad behavior or assumptions, and the next steps.\n<\/td>\nThe email explains some or all of the issues underpinning the situation, the bad behavior or assumptions, and it mentions the next steps, but in an incomplete manner.\n<\/td>\nThe email clearly explains the situation, identifies the bad behavior or assumptions and lays out the next steps in a clear manner.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Structure and presentation<\/b>\n<\/td>\nThe email is structured illogically and its tone and style do not match the situation.\n<\/td>\nThe email is uneven in its structure, tone and style.\n<\/td>\nThe email is structured logically and the tone and style match the situation.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clarity and conciseness<\/b>\n<\/td>\nInformation at times muddled or irrelevant; misses important information or there are lapses in spelling, punctuation, and grammar, which make it difficult for the reader to follow.\n<\/td>\nInformation reasonably clear; occasionally misses important information, with occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation, and grammar but not enough to seriously distract the reader.\n<\/td>\nInformation effectively and efficiently conveyed; highly focused; easily understood. The presentation contains no spelling errors, correct punctuation, and grammar; uses paragraphs, complete sentences.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vocabulary<\/b>\n<\/td>\nSome appropriate vocabulary; tendency to be repetitive. Some correct word choice and discipline-specific terminology.\n<\/td>\nGenerally appropriate vocabulary; not overly repetitive. Generally uses correct word choice and discipline-specific terminology.\n<\/td>\nHighly appropriate, well chosen, precise and varied vocabulary. Consistently uses correct word choice and discipline-specific terminology.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Part B: The happy workforce learning challenge (25%)<\/span><\/h3>\n

\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Ideal outcome\n<\/th>\nExemplary (A)\n<\/th>\nProficient (B)\n<\/th>\nAdequate (C)\n<\/th>\nWeighting\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Defined problem <\/b> pertains to the learner clearly defining the issue or problem in the press release..\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n50%\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Key messages<\/b> pertains to the learner identifying one to three key messages to communicate to the public and press\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n40%\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tone<\/b> pertains to the learner establishing the correct tone and sticking to it throughout the press release.\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n10%\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n