{"id":1514,"date":"2016-08-18T01:28:26","date_gmt":"2016-08-18T01:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/course.oeru.org\/criticalreasoning\/?page_id=1514"},"modified":"2016-08-18T01:28:26","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T01:28:26","slug":"overview","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/course.oeru.org\/criticalreasoning\/learning-pathways\/learning-pathway-4-evaluating-arguments\/overview\/","title":{"rendered":"Overview"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

In Learning Pathway 4 we look at different types of arguments and you will be given ample opportunity to practice your competence at evaluating different kinds of arguments. We should take the arguments that we evaluate seriously, present them in their strongest form, and subject them to careful and deep analysis and assessment. This may require us to be charitable and fill in missing premises or it may require that we assume that an ambiguous term has a meaning suited to the argument\u2019s purposes. We might want to say that the argument is unacceptable as it stands, but that it is acceptable with the missing premises added, and so on. We are sure that you will agree that there is no point in hastily dismissing an argument because it is not clearly expressed, or because some term or phrase is open to ambiguous interpretation. The aim of argument evaluation is to reach the best understanding that we can of the issues and problems the argument deals with.\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n