{"id":1562,"date":"2016-08-18T01:29:32","date_gmt":"2016-08-18T01:29:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/course.oeru.org\/criticalreasoning\/?page_id=1562"},"modified":"2016-08-18T01:29:32","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T01:29:32","slug":"written-assignment-rubric-template","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/course.oeru.org\/criticalreasoning\/resources\/written-assignment-rubric-template\/","title":{"rendered":"Written Assignment Rubric Template"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Written Assignment Rubric\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\n<\/td>\n4\n<\/td>\n3\n<\/td>\n2\n<\/td>\n1 or 0\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Criterion\n<\/th>\nExceptional\n<\/th>\nAcceptable\n<\/th>\nMarginal\n<\/th>\nUnacceptable\n<\/th>\nScore\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Completeness\n<\/th>\nComplete in all respects; reflects all requirements\n<\/td>\nComplete in most respects; reflects most requirements\n<\/td>\nIncomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements\n<\/td>\nIncomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Understanding\n<\/th>\nDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Documentation\n<\/th>\nContains well-documented statements and appropriate references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains adequately documented statements and references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains limited support for statements or references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains no documentation or references to the readings or other sources of information\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Writing mechanics\n<\/th>\nWriting demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness\n<\/td>\nWriting is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors\n<\/td>\nWriting lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors\n<\/td>\nWriting is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
APA format\n<\/th>\nUses APA format accurately and consistently\n<\/td>\nUses APA format with minor violations\n<\/td>\nReflects incomplete knowledge of APA format\n<\/td>\nDoes not use APA format\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total:<\/b>\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Thomas Edison State College\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Scale: 19-20 = A (93-100); 18 = A- (90-92); 17 = B+ (88-89); 14-16 = B (83-87); 13 = B- (80-82); 12 = C+ (78-79); 9-11 = C (73-77); 8 = C- (70-72); 4-7 = D (60-69); 0-3 = F (below 60).\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Suggested alternative for the table<\/span><\/h2>\n

Written Assignment Rubric<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Criterion\n<\/th>\n4
Exceptional<\/b>\n<\/th>\n		3
Acceptable<\/b>\n<\/th>\n		2
Marginal<\/b>\n<\/th>\n		1 or 0
Unacceptable<\/b>\n<\/th>\n		Score\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Completeness\n<\/td>\nComplete in all respects; reflects all requirements\n<\/td>\nComplete in most respects; reflects most requirements\n<\/td>\nIncomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements\n<\/td>\nIncomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Understanding\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s)\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Documentation\n<\/td>\nContains well-documented statements and appropriate references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains adequately documented statements and references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains limited support for statements or references to the readings and other sources of information\n<\/td>\nContains no documentation or references to the readings or other sources of information\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Writing mechanics\n<\/td>\nWriting demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness\n<\/td>\nWriting is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors\n<\/td>\nWriting lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors\n<\/td>\nWriting is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
APA format\n<\/td>\nUses APA format accurately and consistently\n<\/td>\nUses APA format with minor violations\n<\/td>\nReflects incomplete knowledge of APA format\n<\/td>\nDoes not use APA format\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total:<\/b>\n<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Thomas Edison State College<\/b>\n<\/p>\n