{"id":1568,"date":"2017-11-02T04:49:25","date_gmt":"2017-11-02T04:49:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/course.oeru.org\/inda103\/?page_id=1568"},"modified":"2017-11-02T04:49:25","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T04:49:25","slug":"native-title-settlements","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/course.oeru.org\/inda103\/learning-pathways\/native-title-and-heritage-protection\/native-title-settlements\/","title":{"rendered":"Native title settlements"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\"key\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Key Idea<\/h2>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n

It was estimated that only approximately 5% of the Indigenous population would benefit from the first Native Title Act due to the severity of dispossession in most parts of the country.<\/i>\n<\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div><\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/a> <\/p>\n
Uluru – Ayers Rock, Australia 04<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Indigenous communities may now be involved in Native Title claims to reach settlements regarding their country. However, only a small proportion of Indigenous Australians are in a position to make a native title claim. The claims process can take years to reach a conclusion. As noted above the evidential requirements are very high, while the rights gained may be very limited even if the case is successful.<\/p>\n

In February 1994, the Yorta Yorta people were one of the first Indigenous groups in mainland Australia to make a native title claim. This was to be a key case in terms of revealing the extent of the requirements to gain native title. Many Yorta Yorta people had been forcibly relocated from their ancestral lands during the 19th and 20th centuries. Against great odds, some had maintained physical connections with their country. Even so, the judge in this case argued in his decision that they had not maintained their \u2018traditional\u2019 laws and practices and were thus precluded from making a native title claim. The determination by Justice Olney in 1998 ruled that the \u2018tide of history\u2019 had \u2018washed away\u2019 any real acknowledgement of traditional laws and any real observance of traditional customs by the applicants.\n<\/p>\n

In making his determination, Justice Olney relied on some very dubious sources of historical information and a narrow definition of what constitutes \u2018traditional\u2019 laws and customs. The final 2002 High Court decision in this case confirmed the strict requirements of continuity of traditional laws and customs for native title claims to succeed.\n<\/p>\n

This was not quite the end of the story. In 2004 the Victorian government reached a cooperative agreement with the Yorta Yorta people that included recognition of public land, rivers and lakes throughout north-central Victoria.\n<\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\"reading\"\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Optional Further Viewing<\/h2>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Watch a clip of the Quandamooka people\u2019s settlement to gain rights to their land on Stradbroke Island and other islands off the Queensland coast. Their Native Title claim was settled in 2011 after a process taking 16 years.\n<\/p>\n

Making native title count<\/a><\/i>. By Emma Sykes with Terri Begley. 4 July, 2014 9:35AM AEST.\n<\/p>\n

In 2011 the Quandamooka people won a 16-year-long historic battle to have their native title claim recognised on North Stradbroke Island. So three years on, what does the claim mean for the traditional owners?\n<\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n